Determining the Seismic Structure of a Continent - Lessons from Australia B.L.N. Kennett Research School of Earth Sciences Australian National University The Australian continent has very few permanent high-quality seismic stations and most of the information on the lithospheric and mantle structure beneath the region has come from deployments of temporary broad-band instruments since 1992. The SKIPPY experiment from 1993-1996 provide a continent-wide reconnaissance using sequences of deployments of a limited number of instruments. The configuration of a mobile array was dictated by available funding and the high level of regional seismic meant that good data coverage could be achieved with 5-6 months of recording at each site. Over 65 sites were occupied across the continent with an inter-station spacing of approximately 400 km, with some gaps due to logistic (access) issues. Unfortunately, hardware failures increased with time and data coverage in the west of the continent was rather limited and had to be rectified with a further deployment in 2000-2001. From the regional events to the north and east it is possible to get about 300 km resolution for surface wave tomography. The results of SKIPPY have been exploited in the design of follow-up experiments designed to look at different aspects of the lithospheric structure at higher resolution, e.g., the substructure of the cratons. The concept of a mobile array worked quite well but in hindsight could have been improved in a number of ways. It would have been desirable to have a reasonable density of stations with long-term occupation, this would not only provide a basic matrix for surface wave tomography but would also allow better use of the infrequent events suitable for SKS splitting studies. There should also been some degree of overlap between successive deployments (e.g. between summer seasons in Antarctica). Even in Australia we tended to underestimate the logistic difficulties of work in remote environments, these are magnified in the Antarctic. The pattern of broad-scale coverage of the continent with subsequent (or parallel) concentrations of instruments for detailed studies should provide a good basis for international collaboration across Antarctica. Multiple simultaneous experiments would maximise path coverage. Data management structures will be need to set up from the outset to cope with delivery and exchange of data.